 |
Federal FMLA Regulations for the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
What Leave Is an Employee Entitled to Take Under the Family and Medical Leave Act?
| How much leave may an employee take? 825.200
|
| (a) Except in the case of leave to care for a covered servicemember
with a serious injury or illness, an eligible employee's FMLA leave
entitlement is limited to a total of 12 workweeks of leave during any
12-month period for any one, or more, of the following reasons:
(1) The birth of the employee's son or daughter, and to care for
the newborn child;
(2) The placement with the employee of a son or daughter for
adoption or foster care, and to care for the newly placed child;
(3) To care for the employee's spouse, son, daughter, or parent
with a serious health condition;
(4) Because of a serious health condition that makes the employee
unable to perform one or more of the essential functions of his or her
job; and,
(5) Because of any qualifying exigency arising out of the fact that
the employee's spouse, son, daughter, or parent is a covered military
member on active duty (or has been notified of an impending call or
order to active duty) in support of a contingency operation.
(b) An employer is permitted to choose any one of the following
methods for determining the "12-month period" in which the 12 weeks
of leave entitlement described in paragraph (a) of this section occurs:
(1) The calendar year;
(2) Any fixed 12-month "leave year," such as a fiscal year, a
year required by State law, or a year starting on an employee's
"anniversary" date;
(3) The 12-month period measured forward from the date any
employee's first FMLA leave under paragraph (a) begins; or,
(4) A "rolling" 12-month period measured backward from the date
an employee uses any FMLA leave as described in paragraph (a).
(c) Under methods in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section
an employee would be entitled to up to 12 weeks of FMLA leave at any
time in the fixed 12-month period selected. An employee could,
therefore, take 12 weeks of leave at the end of the year and 12 weeks
at the beginning of the following year. Under the method in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, an employee would be entitled to 12 weeks of
leave during the year beginning on the first date FMLA leave is taken;
the next 12-month period would begin the first time FMLA leave is taken
after completion of any previous 12-month period. Under the method in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section, the "rolling" 12-month period, each
time an employee takes FMLA leave the remaining leave entitlement would
be any balance of the 12 weeks which has not been used during the
immediately preceding 12 months. For example, if an employee has taken
eight weeks of leave during the past 12 months, an additional four
weeks of leave could be taken. If an employee used four weeks beginning
February 1, 2008, four weeks beginning June 1, 2008, and four weeks
beginning December 1, 2008, the employee would not be entitled to any
additional leave until February 1, 2009. However, beginning on February
1, 2009, the employee would again be eligible to take FMLA leave,
recouping the right to take the leave in the same manner and amounts in
which it was used in the previous year. Thus, the employee would recoup
(and be entitled to use) one additional day of FMLA leave each day for
four weeks, commencing February 1, 2009. The employee would also begin
to recoup additional days beginning on June 1, 2009, and additional
days beginning on December 1, 2009. Accordingly, employers using the
rolling 12-month period may need to calculate whether the employee is
entitled to take FMLA leave each time that leave is requested, and
employees taking FMLA leave on such a basis may fall in and out of FMLA
protection based on their FMLA usage in the prior 12 months. For
example, in the example above, if the employee needs six weeks of leave
for a serious health condition commencing February 1, 2009, only the
first four weeks of the leave would be FMLA-protected.
(d)(1) Employers will be allowed to choose any one of the
alternatives in paragraph (b) of this section for the leave
entitlements described in paragraph (a) of this section provided the
alternative chosen is applied consistently and uniformly to all
employees. An employer wishing to change to another alternative is
required to give at least 60 days notice to all employees, and the
transition must take place in such a way that the employees retain the
full benefit of 12 weeks of leave under whichever method affords the
greatest benefit to the employee. Under no circumstances may a new
method be implemented in order to avoid the Act's leave requirements.
(2) An exception to this required uniformity would apply in the
case of a multi-State employer who has eligible employees in a State
which has a family and medical leave statute. The State may require a
single method of determining the period during which use of the leave
entitlement is measured. This method may conflict with the method
chosen by the employer to determine "any 12 months" for purposes of
the Federal statute. The employer may comply with the State provision
for all employees employed within that State, and uniformly use another
method provided by this regulation for the leave entitlements described
in paragraph (a) for all other employees.
(e) If an employer fails to select one of the options in paragraph
(b) of this section for measuring the 12-month period for the leave
entitlements described in paragraph (a), the option that provides the
most beneficial outcome for the employee will be used. The employer may
subsequently select an option only by providing the 60-day notice to
all employees of the option the employer intends to implement. During
the running of the 60-day period any other employee who needs FMLA
leave may use the option providing the most beneficial outcome to that
employee. At the conclusion of the 60-day period the employer may
implement the selected option.
(f) An eligible employee's FMLA leave entitlement is limited to a
total of 26 workweeks of leave during a "single 12-month period" to
care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness. An
employer shall determine the "single 12-month period" in which the
26-weeks-of-leave-entitlement described in this paragraph occurs
using the 12-month period measured forward from the date an employee's
first FMLA leave to care for the covered servicemember begins.
See Sec. 825.127(d)(1).
(g) During the "single 12-month period" described in paragraph
(f), an eligible employee's FMLA leave entitlement is limited to a
combined total of 26 workweeks of FMLA leave for any qualifying reason.
See Sec. 825.127(d)(2).
(h) For purposes of determining the amount of leave used by an
employee, the fact that a holiday may occur within the week taken as
FMLA leave has no effect; the week is counted as a week of FMLA leave.
However, if an employee is using FMLA leave in increments of less than
one week, the holiday will not count against the employee's FMLA
entitlement unless the employee was otherwise scheduled and expected to
work during the holiday. Similarly, if for some reason the employer's
business activity has temporarily ceased and employees generally are
not expected to report for work for one or more weeks (e.g., a school
closing two weeks for the Christmas/New Year holiday or the summer
vacation or an employer closing the plant for retooling or repairs),
the days the employer's activities have ceased do not count against the
employee's FMLA leave entitlement. Methods for determining an
employee's 12-week leave entitlement are also described in Sec.
825.205.
[73 FR 68086, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| Intermittent leave or reduced leave schedule 825.202
|
| (a) Definition. FMLA leave may be taken "intermittently or on a
reduced leave schedule" under certain circumstances. Intermittent
leave is FMLA leave taken in separate blocks of time due to a single
qualifying reason. A reduced leave schedule is a leave schedule that
reduces an employee's usual number of working hours per workweek, or
hours per workday. A reduced leave schedule is a change in the
employee's schedule for a period of time, normally from full-time to
part-time.
(b) Medical necessity. For intermittent leave or leave on a reduced
leave schedule taken because of one's own serious health condition, to
care for a parent, son, or daughter with a serious health condition, or
to care for a covered servicemember with a serious injury or illness,
there must be a medical need for leave and it must be that such medical
need can be best accommodated through an intermittent or reduced leave
schedule. The treatment regimen and other information described in the
certification of a serious health condition and in the certification of
a serious injury or illness, if required by the employer, addresses the
medical necessity of intermittent leave or leave on a reduced leave
schedule. See Sec. Sec. 825.306, 825.310. Leave may be taken
intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule when medically necessary
for planned and/or unanticipated medical treatment of a serious health
condition or of a covered servicemember's serious injury or illness, or
for recovery from treatment or recovery from a serious health condition
or a covered servicemember's serious injury or illness. It may also be
taken to provide care or psychological comfort to a covered family
member with a serious health condition or a covered servicemember with
a serious injury or illness.
(1) Intermittent leave may be taken for a serious health condition
of a parent, son, or daughter, for the employee's own serious health
condition, or a serious injury or illness of a covered servicemember
which requires treatment by a health care provider periodically, rather
than for one continuous period of time, and may include leave of
periods from an hour or more to several weeks. Examples of intermittent
leave would include leave taken on an occasional basis for medical
appointments, or leave taken several days at a time spread over a
period of six months, such as for chemotherapy. A pregnant employee may
take leave intermittently for prenatal examinations or for her own
condition, such as for periods of severe morning sickness. An example
of an employee taking leave on a reduced leave schedule is an employee
who is recovering from a serious health condition and is not strong
enough to work a full-time schedule.
(2) Intermittent or reduced schedule leave may be taken for
absences where the employee or family member is incapacitated or unable
to perform the essential functions of the position because of a chronic
serious health condition or a serious injury or illness of a covered
servicemember, even if he or she does not receive treatment by a health
care provider. See Sec. Sec. 825.113 and 825.127.
(c) Birth or placement. When leave is taken after the birth of a
healthy child or placement of a healthy child for adoption or foster
care, an employee may take leave intermittently or on a reduced leave
schedule only if the employer agrees. Such a schedule reduction might
occur, for example, where an employee, with the employer's agreement,
works part-time after the birth of a child, or takes leave in several
segments. The employer's agreement is not required, however, for leave
during which the mother has a serious health condition in connection
with the birth of her child or if the newborn child has a serious
health condition. See Sec. 825.204 for rules governing transfer to an
alternative position that better accommodates intermittent leave. See
also Sec. 825.120 (pregnancy) and Sec. 825.121 (adoption and foster
care).
(d) Qualifying exigency. Leave due to a qualifying exigency may be
taken on an intermittent or reduced leave schedule basis.
[60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995; 73 FR 68087, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| Scheduling of intermittent or reduced scheduled leave. 825.203
|
| Eligible employees may take FMLA leave on an intermittent or
reduced schedule basis when medically necessary due to the serious
health condition of a covered family member or the employee or the
serious injury or illness of a covered servicemember. See Sec.
825.202. Eligible employees may also take FMLA leave on an intermittent
or reduced schedule basis when necessary because of a qualifying
exigency. If an employee needs leave intermittently or on a reduced
leave schedule for planned medical treatment, then the employee must
make a reasonable effort to schedule the treatment so as not to disrupt
unduly the employer's operations.
[73 FR 68088, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| May an employer deduct hourly amounts from an employee's salary, when providing unpaid leave under FMLA, without affecting the employee's qualification for exemption as an executive, administrative, or professional employee, or when utilizing the fluctuating workweek method for payment of overtime, under the Fair Labor Standards Act? 825.206
|
| (a) Leave taken under FMLA may be unpaid. If an employee is
otherwise exempt from minimum wage and overtime requirements of the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) as a salaried executive,
administrative, professional, or computer employee (under regulations
issued by the Secretary, 29 CFR part 541), providing unpaid FMLA-
qualifying leave to such an employee will not cause the employee to
lose the FLSA exemption. See 29 CFR 541.602(b)(7). This means that
under regulations currently in effect, where an employee meets the
specified duties test, is paid on a salary basis, and is paid a salary
of at least the amount specified in the regulations, the employer may
make deductions from the employee's salary for any hours taken as
intermittent or reduced FMLA leave within a workweek, without affecting
the exempt status of the employee. The fact that an employer provides
FMLA leave, whether paid or unpaid, and maintains records required by
this part regarding FMLA leave, will not be relevant to the
determination whether an employee is exempt within the meaning of 29
CFR part 541.
(b) For an employee paid in accordance with the fluctuating
workweek method of payment for overtime (see 29 CFR 778.114), the
employer, during the period in which intermittent or reduced schedule
FMLA leave is scheduled to be taken, may compensate an employee on an
hourly basis and pay only for the hours the employee works, including
time and one-half the employee's regular rate for overtime hours. The
change to payment on an hourly basis would include the entire period
during which the employee is taking intermittent leave, including weeks
in which no leave is taken. The hourly rate shall be determined by
dividing the employee's weekly salary by the employee's normal or
average schedule of hours worked during weeks in which FMLA leave is
not being taken. If an employer chooses to follow this exception from
the fluctuating workweek method of payment, the employer must do so
uniformly, with respect to all employees paid on a fluctuating workweek
basis for whom FMLA leave is taken on an intermittent or reduced leave
schedule basis. If an employer does not elect to convert the employee's
compensation to hourly pay, no deduction may be taken for FMLA leave
absences. Once the need for intermittent or reduced scheduled leave is
over, the employee may be restored to payment on a fluctuating work
week basis.
(c) This special exception to the "salary basis" requirements of
the FLSA exemption or fluctuating workweek payment requirements applies
only to employees of covered employers who are eligible for FMLA leave,
and to leave which qualifies as FMLA leave. Hourly or other deductions
which are not in accordance with 29 CFR part 541 or 29 CFR 778.114 may
not be taken, for example, from the salary of an employee who works for
an employer with fewer than 50 employees, or where the employee has not
worked long enough to be eligible for FMLA leave without potentially
affecting the employee's eligibility for exemption. Nor may deductions
which are not permitted by 29 CFR part 541 or 29 CFR 778.114 be taken
from such an employee's salary for any leave which does not qualify as
FMLA leave, for example, deductions from an employee's pay for leave
required under State law or under an employer's policy or practice for
a reason which does not qualify as FMLA leave, e.g., leave to care for
a grandparent or for a medical condition which does not qualify as a
serious health condition or serious injury or illness; or for leave
which is more generous than provided by FMLA. Employers may comply with
State law or the employer's own policy/practice under these
circumstances and maintain the employee's eligibility for exemption or
for the fluctuating workweek method of pay by not taking hourly
deductions from the employee's pay, in accordance with FLSA
requirements, or may take such deductions, treating the employee as an
"hourly" employee and pay overtime premium pay for hours worked over
40 in a workweek.
[73 FR 68089, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| Is FMLA leave paid or unpaid? 825.207
|
| (a) Generally, FMLA leave is unpaid leave. However, under the
circumstances described in this section, FMLA permits an eligible
employee to choose to substitute accrued paid leave for FMLA leave. If
an employee does not choose to substitute accrued paid leave, the
employer may require the employee to substitute accrued paid leave for
unpaid FMLA leave. The term "substitute" means that the paid leave
provided by the employer, and accrued pursuant to established policies
of the employer, will run concurrently with the unpaid FMLA leave.
Accordingly, the employee receives pay pursuant to the employer's
applicable paid leave policy during the period of otherwise unpaid FMLA
leave. An employee's ability to substitute accrued paid leave is
determined by the terms and conditions of the employer's normal leave
policy. When an employee chooses, or an employer requires, substitution
of accrued paid leave, the employer must inform the employee that the
employee must satisfy any procedural requirements of the paid leave
policy only in connection with the receipt of such payment. See Sec.
825.300(c). If an employee does not comply with the additional
requirements in an employer's paid leave policy, the employee is not
entitled to substitute accrued paid leave, but the employee remains
entitled to take unpaid FMLA leave. Employers may not discriminate
against employees on FMLA leave in the administration of their paid
leave policies.
(b) If neither the employee nor the employer elects to substitute
paid leave for unpaid FMLA leave under the above conditions and
circumstances, the employee will remain entitled to all the
paid leave which is earned or accrued under the terms of the employer's
plan.
(c) If an employee uses paid leave under circumstances which do not
qualify as FMLA leave, the leave will not count against the employee's
FMLA leave entitlement. For example, paid sick leave used for a medical
condition which is not a serious health condition or serious injury or
illness does not count against the employee's FMLA leave entitlement.
(d) Leave taken pursuant to a disability leave plan would be
considered FMLA leave for a serious health condition and counted in the
leave entitlement permitted under FMLA if it meets the criteria set
forth above in Sec. Sec. 825.112-825.115. In such cases, the employer
may designate the leave as FMLA leave and count the leave against the
employee's FMLA leave entitlement. Because leave pursuant to a
disability benefit plan is not unpaid, the provision for substitution
of the employee's accrued paid leave is inapplicable, and neither the
employee nor the employer may require the substitution of paid leave.
However, employers and employees may agree, where state law permits, to
have paid leave supplement the disability plan benefits, such as in the
case where a plan only provides replacement income for two-thirds of an
employee's salary.
(e) The Act provides that a serious health condition may result
from injury to the employee "on or off" the job. If the employer
designates the leave as FMLA leave in accordance with Sec. 825.300(d),
the leave counts against the employee's FMLA leave entitlement. Because
the workers' compensation absence is not unpaid, the provision for
substitution of the employee's accrued paid leave is not applicable,
and neither the employee nor the employer may require the substitution
of paid leave. However, employers and employees may agree, where state
law permits, to have paid leave supplement workers' compensation
benefits, such as in the case where workers' compensation only provides
replacement income for two-thirds of an employee's salary. If the
health care provider treating the employee for the workers'
compensation injury certifies the employee is able to return to a
"light duty job" but is unable to return to the same or equivalent
job, the employee may decline the employer's offer of a "light duty
job." As a result the employee may lose workers' compensation
payments, but is entitled to remain on unpaid FMLA leave until the
employee's FMLA leave entitlement is exhausted. As of the date workers'
compensation benefits cease, the substitution provision becomes
applicable and either the employee may elect or the employer may
require the use of accrued paid leave. See also Sec. Sec. 825.210(f),
825.216(d), 825.220(d), 825.307(a) and 825.702(d)(1) and (2) regarding
the relationship between workers' compensation absences and FMLA leave.
(f) Section 7(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) permits
public employers under prescribed circumstances to substitute
compensatory time off accrued at one and one-half hours for each
overtime hour worked in lieu of paying cash to an employee when the
employee works overtime hours as prescribed by the Act. This section of
the FLSA limits the number of hours of compensatory time an employee
may accumulate depending upon whether the employee works in fire
protection or law enforcement (480 hours) or elsewhere for a public
agency (240 hours). In addition, under the FLSA, an employer always has
the right to cash out an employee's compensatory time or to require the
employee to use the time. Therefore, if an employee requests and is
permitted to use accrued compensatory time to receive pay for time
taken off for an FMLA reason, or if the employer requires such use
pursuant to the FLSA, the time taken may be counted against the
employee's FMLA leave entitlement.
[60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995; 73 FR 68089, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| Under what circumstances may an employer designate leave, paid or unpaid, as FMLA leave and, as a result, count it against the employee's total FMLA leave entitlement? 825.208
|
| (a) In all circumstances, it is the employer's responsibility to
designate leave, paid or unpaid, as FMLA-qualifying, and to give notice
of the designation to the employee as provided in this section. In the
case of intermittent leave or leave on a reduced schedule, only one such
notice is required unless the circumstances regarding the leave have
changed. The employer's designation decision must be based only on
information received from the employee or the employee's spokesperson
(e.g., if the employee is incapacitated, the employee's spouse, adult
child, parent, doctor, etc., may provide notice to the employer of the
need to take FMLA leave). In any circumstance where the employer does
not have sufficient information about the reason for an employee's use
of paid leave, the employer should inquire further of the employee or
the spokesperson to ascertain whether the paid leave is potentially
FMLA-qualifying.
(1) An employee giving notice of the need for unpaid FMLA leave must
explain the reasons for the needed leave so as to allow the employer to
determine that the leave qualifies under the Act. If the employee fails
to explain the reasons, leave may be denied. In many cases, in
explaining the reasons for a request to use paid leave, especially when
the need for the leave was unexpected or unforeseen, an employee will
provide sufficient information for the employer to designate the paid
leave as FMLA leave. An employee using accrued paid leave, especially
vacation or personal leave, may in some cases not spontaneously explain
the reasons or their plans for using their accrued leave.
(2) As noted in Sec. 825.302(c), an employee giving notice of the
need for unpaid FMLA leave does not need to expressly assert rights
under the Act or
even mention the FMLA to meet his or her obligation to provide notice,
though the employee would need to state a qualifying reason for the
needed leave. An employee requesting or notifying the employer of an
intent to use accrued paid leave, even if for a purpose covered by FMLA,
would not need to assert such right either. However, if an employee
requesting to use paid leave for an FMLA-qualifying purpose does not
explain the reason for the leave--consistent with the employer's
established policy or practice--and the employer denies the employee's
request, the employee will need to provide sufficient information to
establish an FMLA-qualifying reason for the needed leave so that the
employer is aware of the employee's entitlement (i.e., that the leave
may not be denied) and, then, may designate that the paid leave be
appropriately counted against (substituted for) the employee's 12-week
entitlement. Similarly, an employee using accrued paid vacation leave
who seeks an extension of unpaid leave for an FMLA-qualifying purpose
will need to state the reason. If this is due to an event which occurred
during the period of paid leave, the employer may count the leave used
after the FMLA-qualifying event against the employee's 12-week
entitlement.
(b)(1) Once the employer has acquired knowledge that the leave is
being taken for an FMLA required reason, the employer must promptly
(within two business days absent extenuating circumstances) notify the
employee that the paid leave is designated and will be counted as FMLA
leave. If there is a dispute between an employer and an employee as to
whether paid leave qualifies as FMLA leave, it should be resolved
through discussions between the employee and the employer. Such
discussions and the decision must be documented.
(2) The employer's notice to the employee that the leave has been
designated as FMLA leave may be orally or in writing. If the notice is
oral, it shall be confirmed in writing, no later than the following
payday (unless the payday is less than one week after the oral notice,
in which case the notice must be no later than the subsequent payday).
The written notice may be in any form, including a notation on the
employee's pay stub.
(c) If the employer requires paid leave to be substituted for unpaid
leave, or that paid leave taken under an existing leave plan be counted
as FMLA leave, this decision must be made by the employer within two
business days of the time the employee gives notice of the need for
leave, or, where the employer does not initially have sufficient
information to make a determination, when the employer determines that
the leave qualifies as FMLA leave if this happens later. The employer's
designation must be made before the leave starts, unless the employer
does not have sufficient information as to the employee's reason for
taking the leave until after the leave commenced. If the employer has
the requisite knowledge to make a determination that the paid leave is
for an FMLA reason at the time the employee either gives notice of the
need for leave or commences leave and fails to designate the leave as
FMLA leave (and so notify the employee in accordance with paragraph
(b)), the employer may not designate leave as FMLA leave retroactively,
and may designate only prospectively as of the date of notification to
the employee of the designation. In such circumstances, the employee is
subject to the full protections of the Act, but none of the absence
preceding the notice to the employee of the designation may be counted
against the employee's 12-week FMLA leave entitlement.
(d) If the employer learns that leave is for an FMLA purpose after
leave has begun, such as when an employee gives notice of the need for
an extension of the paid leave with unpaid FMLA leave, the entire or
some portion of the paid leave period may be retroactively counted as
FMLA leave, to the extent that the leave period qualified as FMLA leave.
For example, an employee is granted two weeks paid vacation leave for a
skiing trip. In mid-week of the second week, the employee contacts the
employer for an extension of leave as unpaid leave and advises that at
the beginning of the second week of paid vacation leave the employee
suffered a severe accident requiring hospitalization. The employer
may notify the employee that both the extension and the second week of
paid vacation leave (from the date of the injury) is designated as FMLA
leave. On the other hand, when the employee takes sick leave that turns
into a serious health condition (e.g., bronchitis that turns into
bronchial pneumonia) and the employee gives notice of the need for an
extension of leave, the entire period of the serious health condition
may be counted as FMLA leave.
(e) Employers may not designate leave as FMLA leave after the
employee has returned to work with two exceptions:
(1) If the employee was absent for an FMLA reason and the employer
did not learn the reason for the absence until the employee's return
(e.g., where the employee was absent for only a brief period), the
employer may, upon the employee's return to work, promptly (within two
business days of the employee's return to work) designate the leave
retroactively with appropriate notice to the employee. If leave is taken
for an FMLA reason but the employer was not aware of the reason, and the
employee desires that the leave be counted as FMLA leave, the employee
must notify the employer within two business days of returning to work
of the reason for the leave. In the absence of such timely notification
by the employee, the employee may not subsequently assert FMLA
protections for the absence.
(2) If the employer knows the reason for the leave but has not been
able to confirm that the leave qualifies under FMLA, or where the
employer has requested medical certification which has not yet been
received or the parties are in the process of obtaining a second or
third medical opinion, the employer should make a preliminary
designation, and so notify the employee, at the time leave begins, or as
soon as the reason for the leave becomes known. Upon receipt of the
requisite information from the employee or of the medical certification
which confirms the leave is for an FMLA reason, the preliminary
designation becomes final. If the medical certifications fail to confirm
that the reason for the absence was an FMLA reason, the employer must
withdraw the designation (with written notice to the employee).
[60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995]
|

|
| Is an employee entitled to benefits while using FMLA leave? 825.209
|
| (a) During any FMLA leave, an employer must maintain the employee's
coverage under any group health plan (as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 at 26 U.S.C. 5000(b)(1)) on the same conditions as
coverage would have been provided if the employee had been continuously
employed during the entire leave period. All employers covered by FMLA,
including public agencies, are subject to the Act's requirements to
maintain health coverage. The definition of "group health plan" is
set forth in Sec. 825.800. For purposes of FMLA, the term "group
health plan" shall not include an insurance program providing health
coverage under which employees purchase individual policies from
insurers provided that:
(1) No contributions are made by the employer;
(2) Participation in the program is completely voluntary for
employees;
(3) The sole functions of the employer with respect to the program
are, without endorsing the program, to permit the insurer to publicize
the program to employees, to collect premiums through payroll
deductions and to remit them to the insurer;
(4) The employer receives no consideration in the form of cash or
otherwise in connection with the program, other than reasonable
compensation, excluding any profit, for administrative services
actually rendered in connection with payroll deduction; and,
(5) The premium charged with respect to such coverage does not
increase in the event the employment relationship terminates.
(b) The same group health plan benefits provided to an employee
prior to taking FMLA leave must be maintained during the FMLA leave.
For example, if family member coverage is provided to an employee,
family member coverage must be maintained during the FMLA leave.
Similarly, benefit coverage during FMLA leave for medical care,
surgical care, hospital care, dental care, eye care, mental health
counseling, substance abuse treatment, etc., must be maintained during
leave if provided in an employer's group health plan, including a
supplement to a group health plan, whether or not provided through a
flexible spending account or other component of a cafeteria plan.
(c) If an employer provides a new health plan or benefits or
changes health benefits or plans while an employee is on FMLA leave,
the employee is entitled to the new or changed plan/benefits to the
same extent as if the employee were not on leave. For example, if an
employer changes a group health plan so that dental care becomes
covered under the plan, an employee on FMLA leave must be given the
same opportunity as other employees to receive (or obtain) the dental
care coverage. Any other plan changes (e.g., in coverage, premiums,
deductibles, etc.) which apply to all employees of the workforce would
also apply to an employee on FMLA leave.
(d) Notice of any opportunity to change plans or benefits must also
be given to an employee on FMLA leave. If the group health plan permits
an employee to change from single to family coverage upon the birth of
a child or otherwise add new family members, such a change in benefits
must be made available while an employee is on FMLA leave. If the
employee requests the changed coverage it must be provided by the
employer.
(e) An employee may choose not to retain group health plan coverage
during FMLA leave. However, when an employee returns from leave, the
employee is entitled to be reinstated on the same terms as prior
to taking the leave, including family or dependent coverages,
without any qualifying period, physical examination, exclusion
of pre-existing conditions, etc. See Sec. 825.212(c).
(f) Except as required by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA) and for "key" employees (as
discussed below), an employer's obligation to maintain health benefits
during leave (and to restore the employee to the same or equivalent
employment) under FMLA ceases if and when the employment relationship
would have terminated if the employee had not taken FMLA leave (e.g.,
if the employee's position is eliminated as part of a nondiscriminatory
reduction in force and the employee would not have been transferred to
another position); an employee informs the employer of his or her
intent not to return from leave (including before starting the leave if
the employer is so informed before the leave starts); or the employee
fails to return from leave or continues on leave after exhausting his
or her FMLA leave entitlement in the 12-month period.
(g) If a "key employee" (see Sec. 825.218) does not return from
leave when notified by the employer that substantial or grievous
economic injury will result from his or her reinstatement, the
employee's entitlement to group health plan benefits continues unless
and until the employee advises the employer that the employee does not
desire restoration to employment at the end of the leave period, or the
FMLA leave entitlement is exhausted, or reinstatement is actually
denied.
(h) An employee's entitlement to benefits other than group health
benefits during a period of FMLA leave (e.g., holiday pay) is to be
determined by the employer's established policy for providing such
benefits when the employee is on other forms of leave (paid or unpaid,
as appropriate).
[60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995; 73 FR 68090, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| How may employees on FMLA leave pay their share of group health benefit premiums? 825.210
|
| (a) Group health plan benefits must be maintained on the same basis
as coverage would have been provided if the employee had been
continuously employed during the FMLA leave period. Therefore, any
share of group health plan premiums which had been paid by the employee
prior to FMLA leave must continue to be paid by the employee during the
FMLA leave period. If premiums are raised or lowered, the employee
would be required to pay the new premium rates. Maintenance of health
insurance policies which are not a part of the employer's group health
plan, as described in Sec. 825.209(a), are the sole responsibility of
the employee. The employee and the insurer should make necessary
arrangements for payment of premiums during periods of unpaid FMLA
leave.
(b) If the FMLA leave is substituted paid leave, the employee's
share of premiums must be paid by the method normally used during any
paid leave, presumably as a payroll deduction.
(c) If FMLA leave is unpaid, the employer has a number of options
for obtaining payment from the employee. The employer may require that
payment be made to the employer or to the insurance carrier, but no
additional charge may be added to the employee's premium payment for
administrative expenses. The employer may require employees to pay
their share of premium payments in any of the following ways:
(1) Payment would be due at the same time as it would be made if by
payroll deduction;
(2) Payment would be due on the same schedule as payments are made
under COBRA;
(3) Payment would be prepaid pursuant to a cafeteria plan at the
employee's option;
(4) The employer's existing rules for payment by employees on
"leave without pay" would be followed, provided that such rules do
not require prepayment (i.e., prior to the commencement of the leave)
of the premiums that will become due during a period of unpaid FMLA
leave or payment of higher premiums than if the employee had continued
to work instead of taking leave; or,
(5) Another system voluntarily agreed to between the employer and
the employee, which may include prepayment of premiums (e.g., through
increased payroll deductions when the need for the FMLA leave is
foreseeable).
(d) The employer must provide the employee with advance written
notice of the terms and conditions under which these payments must be
made. See Sec. 825.300(c).
(e) An employer may not require more of an employee using unpaid
FMLA leave than the employer requires of other employees on "leave
without pay."
(f) An employee who is receiving payments as a result of a workers'
compensation injury must make arrangements with the employer for
payment of group health plan benefits when simultaneously taking FMLA
leave. See Sec. 825.207(e).
[60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995; 73 FR 68091, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| What special health benefits maintenance rules apply to multi-employer health plans? 825.211
|
| (a) A multi-employer health plan is a plan to which more than one
employer is required to contribute, and which is maintained pursuant to
one or more collective bargaining agreements between employee
organization(s) and the employers.
(b) An employer under a multi-employer plan must continue to make
contributions on behalf of an employee using FMLA leave as though the
employee had been continuously employed, unless the plan contains an
explicit FMLA provision for maintaining coverage such as through pooled
contributions by all employers party to the plan.
(c) During the duration of an employee's FMLA leave, coverage by
the group health plan, and benefits provided pursuant to the plan, must
be maintained at the level of coverage and benefits which were
applicable to the employee at the time FMLA leave commenced.
(d) An employee using FMLA leave cannot be required to use
``banked' hours or pay a greater premium than the employee would have
been required to pay if the employee had been continuously employed.
(e) As provided in Sec. 825.209(f) of this part, group health plan
coverage must be maintained for an employee on FMLA leave until:
(1) The employee's FMLA leave entitlement is exhausted;
(2) The employer can show that the employee would have been laid
off and the employment relationship terminated; or,
(3) The employee provides unequivocal notice of intent not to
return to work.
[73 FR 68091, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| What are the consequences of an employee's failure to make timely health plan premium payments? 825.212
|
| (a)(1) In the absence of an established employer policy providing a
longer grace period, an employer's obligations to maintain health
insurance coverage cease under FMLA if an employee's premium payment is
more than 30 days late. In order to drop the coverage for an employee
whose premium payment is late, the employer must provide written notice
to the employee that the payment has not been received. Such notice
must be mailed to the employee at least 15 days before coverage is to
cease, advising that coverage will be dropped on a specified date at
least 15 days after the date of the letter unless the payment has been
received by that date. If the employer has established policies
regarding other forms of unpaid leave that provide for the employer to
cease coverage retroactively to the date the unpaid premium payment was due,
the employer may drop the employee from coverage retroactively in
accordance with that policy, provided the 15-day notice was given. In
the absence of such a policy, coverage for the employee may be
terminated at the end of the 30-day grace period, where the required
15-day notice has been provided.
(2) An employer has no obligation regarding the maintenance of a
health insurance policy which is not a "group health plan." See Sec.
825.209(a).
(3) All other obligations of an employer under FMLA would continue;
for example, the employer continues to have an obligation to reinstate
an employee upon return from leave.
(b) The employer may recover the employee's share of any premium
payments missed by the employee for any FMLA leave period during which
the employer maintains health coverage by paying the employee's share
after the premium payment is missed.
(c) If coverage lapses because an employee has not made required
premium payments, upon the employee's return from FMLA leave the
employer must still restore the employee to coverage/benefits
equivalent to those the employee would have had if leave had not been
taken and the premium payment(s) had not been missed, including family
or dependent coverage. See Sec. 825.215(d)(1) through (5). In such
case, an employee may not be required to meet any qualification
requirements imposed by the plan, including any new preexisting
condition waiting period, to wait for an open season, or to pass a
medical examination to obtain reinstatement of coverage. If an employer
terminates an employee's insurance in accordance with this section and
fails to restore the employee's health insurance as required by this
section upon the employee's return, the employer may be liable for
benefits lost by reason of the violation, for other actual monetary
losses sustained as a direct result of the violation, and for
appropriate equitable relief tailored to the harm suffered.
[73 FR 68091, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| May an employer recover costs it incurred for maintaining ``group health plan' or other non-health benefits coverage during FMLA leave? 825.213
|
| (a) In addition to the circumstances discussed in Sec. 825.212(b),
an employer may recover its share of health plan premiums during a
period of unpaid FMLA leave from an employee if the employee fails to
return to work after the employee's FMLA leave entitlement has been
exhausted or expires, unless the reason the employee does not return is
due to:
(1) The continuation, recurrence, or onset of either a serious
health condition of the employee or the employee's family member, or a
serious injury or illness of a covered servicemember, which would
otherwise entitle the employee to leave under FMLA; or
(2) Other circumstances beyond the employee's control. Examples of
"other circumstances beyond the employee's control" are necessarily
broad. They include such situations as where a parent chooses to stay
home with a newborn child who has a serious health condition; an
employee's spouse is unexpectedly transferred to a job location more
than 75 miles from the employee's worksite; a relative or individual
other than a covered family member has a serious health condition and
the employee is needed to provide care; the employee is laid off while
on leave; or, the employee is a "key employee" who decides not to
return to work upon being notified of the employer's intention to deny
restoration because of substantial and grievous economic injury to the
employer's operations and is not reinstated by the employer. Other
circumstances beyond the employee's control would not include a
situation where an employee desires to remain with a parent in a
distant city even though the parent no longer requires the employee's
care, or a parent chooses not to return to work to stay home with a
well, newborn child.
(3) When an employee fails to return to work because of the
continuation, recurrence, or onset of either a serious health condition
of the employee or employee's family member, or a serious injury or
illness of a covered servicemember, thereby precluding the employer
from recovering its (share of) health benefit premium payments made on
the employee's behalf during a period of unpaid FMLA leave, the
employer may require medical certification of the employee's or the
family member's serious health condition or the covered servicemember's
serious injury or illness. Such certification is not required unless
requested by the employer. The cost of the certification shall be borne
by the employee, and the employee is not entitled to be paid for the
time or travel costs spent in acquiring the certification. The employee
is required to provide medical certification in a timely manner which,
for purposes of this section, is within 30 days from the date of the
employer's request. For purposes of medical certification, the employee
may use the optional DOL forms developed for these purposes (see
Sec. Sec. 825.306(b), 825.310(c)-(d) and Appendices B and H of this
part). If the employer requests medical certification and the employee
does not provide such certification in a timely manner (within 30
days), or the reason for not returning to work does not meet the test
of other circumstances beyond the employee's control, the employer may
recover 100% of the health benefit premiums it paid during the period
of unpaid FMLA leave.
(b) Under some circumstances an employer may elect to maintain
other benefits, e.g., life insurance, disability insurance, etc., by
paying the employee's (share of) premiums during periods of unpaid FMLA
leave. For example, to ensure the employer can meet its
responsibilities to provide equivalent benefits to the employee upon
return from unpaid FMLA leave, it may be necessary that premiums be
paid continuously to avoid a lapse of coverage. If the employer elects
to maintain such benefits during the leave, at the conclusion of leave,
the employer is entitled to recover only the costs incurred for paying
the employee's share of any premiums whether or not the employee
returns to work.
(c) An employee who returns to work for at least 30 calendar days
is considered to have "returned" to work. An employee who transfers
directly from taking FMLA leave to retirement, or who retires during
the first 30 days after the employee returns to work, is deemed to have
returned to work.
(d) When an employee elects or an employer requires paid leave to
be substituted for FMLA leave, the employer may not recover its (share
of) health insurance or other non-health benefit premiums for any
period of FMLA leave covered by paid leave. Because paid leave provided
under a plan covering temporary disabilities (including workers'
compensation) is not unpaid, recovery of health insurance premiums does
not apply to such paid leave.
(e) The amount that self-insured employers may recover is limited
to only the employer's share of allowable "premiums" as would be
calculated under COBRA, excluding the 2 percent fee for administrative
costs.
(f) When an employee fails to return to work, any health and non-
health benefit premiums which this section of the regulations permits
an employer to recover are a debt owed by the non-returning employee to
the employer. The existence of this debt caused by the employee's
failure to return to work does not alter the employer's
responsibilities for health benefit coverage and, under a self-
insurance plan, payment of claims incurred during the period of FMLA leave.
To the extent recovery is allowed, the employer may recover the costs
through deduction from any sums due to the employee (e.g., unpaid
wages, vacation pay, profit sharing, etc.), provided such deductions do
not otherwise violate applicable Federal or State wage payment or other
laws. Alternatively, the employer may initiate legal action against the
employee to recover such costs.
[73 FR 68092, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| What are an employee's rights on returning to work from FMLA leave? 825.214
|
| General rule. On return from FMLA leave, an employee is entitled to
be returned to the same position the employee held when leave
commenced, or to an equivalent position with equivalent benefits, pay,
and other terms and conditions of employment. An employee is entitled
to such reinstatement even if the employee has been replaced or his or
her position has been restructured to accommodate the employee's
absence. See also Sec. 825.106(e) for the obligations of joint
employers.
[60 FR 2237, Jan. 6, 1995; 60 FR 16383, Mar. 30, 1995; 73 FR 68093, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| What is an equivalent position? 825.215
|
| (a) Equivalent position. An equivalent position is one that is
virtually identical to the employee's former position in terms of pay,
benefits and working conditions, including privileges, perquisites and
status. It must involve the same or substantially similar duties and
responsibilities, which must entail substantially equivalent skill,
effort, responsibility, and authority.
(b) Conditions to qualify. If an employee is no longer qualified
for the position because of the employee's inability to attend a
necessary course, renew a license, fly a minimum number of hours, etc.,
as a result of the leave, the employee shall be given a reasonable
opportunity to fulfill those conditions upon return to work.
(c) Equivalent pay. (1) An employee is entitled to any
unconditional pay increases which may have occurred during the FMLA
leave period, such as cost of living increases. Pay increases
conditioned upon seniority, length of service, or work performed must
be granted in accordance with the employer's policy or practice with
respect to other employees on an equivalent leave status for a reason
that does not qualify as FMLA leave. An employee is entitled to be
restored to a position with the same or equivalent pay premiums, such
as a shift differential. If an employee departed from a position
averaging ten hours of overtime (and corresponding overtime pay) each
week, an employee is ordinarily entitled to such a position on return
from FMLA leave.
(2) Equivalent pay includes any bonus or payment, whether it is
discretionary or non-discretionary, made to employees consistent with
the provisions of paragraph (c)(1) of this section. However, if a bonus
or other payment is based on the achievement of a specified goal such
as hours worked, products sold or perfect attendance, and the employee
has not met the goal due to FMLA leave, then the payment may be denied,
unless otherwise paid to employees on an equivalent leave status for a
reason that does not qualify as FMLA leave. For example, if an employee
who used paid vacation leave for a non-FMLA purpose would receive the
payment, then the employee who used paid vacation leave for an FMLA-
protected purpose also must receive the payment.
(d) Equivalent benefits. "Benefits" include all benefits provided
or made available to employees by an employer, including group life
insurance, health insurance, disability insurance, sick leave, annual
leave, educational benefits, and pensions, regardless of whether such
benefits are provided by a practice or written policy of an employer
through an employee benefit plan as defined in Section 3(3) of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. 1002(3).
(1) At the end of an employee's FMLA leave, benefits must be
resumed in the same manner and at the same levels as provided when the
leave began, and subject to any changes in benefit levels that may have
taken place during the period of FMLA leave affecting the entire
workforce, unless otherwise elected by the employee. Upon return from
FMLA leave, an employee cannot be required to requalify for any
benefits the employee enjoyed before FMLA leave began (including family
or dependent coverages). For example, if an employee was covered by a
life insurance policy before taking leave but is not covered or
coverage lapses during the period of unpaid FMLA leave, the employee
cannot be required to meet any qualifications, such as taking a
physical examination, in order to requalify for life insurance upon
return from leave. Accordingly, some employers may find it necessary to
modify life insurance and other benefits programs in order to restore
employees to equivalent benefits upon return from FMLA leave, make
arrangements for continued payment of costs to maintain such benefits
during unpaid FMLA leave, or pay these costs subject to recovery from
the employee on return from leave. See Sec. 825.213(b).
(2) An employee may, but is not entitled to, accrue any additional
benefits or seniority during unpaid FMLA leave. Benefits accrued at the
time leave began, however, (e.g., paid vacation, sick or personal leave
to the extent not substituted for FMLA leave) must be available to an
employee upon return from leave.
(3) If, while on unpaid FMLA leave, an employee desires to continue
life insurance, disability insurance, or other types of benefits for
which he or she typically pays, the employer is required to follow
established policies or practices for continuing such benefits for
other instances of leave without pay. If the employer has no
established policy, the employee and the employer are encouraged to
agree upon arrangements before FMLA leave begins.
(4) With respect to pension and other retirement plans, any period
of unpaid FMLA leave shall not be treated as or counted toward a break
in service for purposes of vesting and eligibility to participate.
Also, if the plan requires an employee to be employed on a specific
date in order to be credited with a year of service for vesting,
contributions or participation purposes, an employee on unpaid FMLA
leave on that date shall be deemed to have been employed on that date.
However, unpaid FMLA leave periods need not be treated as credited
service for purposes of benefit accrual, vesting and eligibility to
participate.
(5) Employees on unpaid FMLA leave are to be treated as if they
continued to work for purposes of changes to benefit plans. They are
entitled to changes in benefits plans, except those which may be
dependent upon seniority or accrual during the leave period,
immediately upon return from leave or to the same extent they would
have qualified if no leave had been taken. For example, if the benefit
plan is predicated on a pre-established number of hours worked each
year and the employee does not have sufficient hours as a result of
taking unpaid FMLA leave, the benefit is lost. (In this regard, Sec.
825.209 addresses health benefits.)
(e) Equivalent terms and conditions of employment. An equivalent
position must have substantially similar duties, conditions,
responsibilities, privileges and status as the employee's original
position.
(1) The employee must be reinstated to the same or a geographically
proximate worksite (i.e., one that does not involve a significant
increase in commuting time or distance) from where the employee had
previously been employed. If the employee's original worksite has been
closed, the employee is entitled to the same rights as if the
employee had not been on leave when the worksite closed. For
example, if an employer transfers all employees from a closed worksite
to a new worksite in a different city, the employee on leave is also
entitled to transfer under the same conditions as if he or she had
continued to be employed.
(2) The employee is ordinarily entitled to return to the same shift
or the same or an equivalent work schedule.
(3) The employee must have the same or an equivalent opportunity
for bonuses, profit-sharing, and other similar discretionary and non-
discretionary payments.
(4) FMLA does not prohibit an employer from accommodating an
employee's request to be restored to a different shift, schedule, or
position which better suits the employee's personal needs on return
from leave, or to offer a promotion to a better position. However, an
employee cannot be induced by the employer to accept a different
position against the employee's wishes.
(f) De minimis exception. The requirement that an employee be
restored to the same or equivalent job with the same or equivalent pay,
benefits, and terms and conditions of employment does not extend to de
minimis, intangible, or unmeasurable aspects of the job.
[73 FR 68093, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| Are there any limitations on an employer's obligation to reinstate an employee? 825.216
|
| (a) An employee has no greater right to reinstatement or to other
benefits and conditions of employment than if the employee had been
continuously employed during the FMLA leave period. An employer must be
able to show that an employee would not otherwise have been employed at
the time reinstatement is requested in order to deny restoration to
employment. For example:
(1) If an employee is laid off during the course of taking FMLA
leave and employment is terminated, the employer's responsibility to
continue FMLA leave, maintain group health plan benefits and restore
the employee cease at the time the employee is laid off, provided the
employer has no continuing obligations under a collective bargaining
agreement or otherwise. An employer would have the burden of proving
that an employee would have been laid off during the FMLA leave period
and, therefore, would not be entitled to restoration. Restoration to a
job slated for lay-off when the employee's original position is not
would not meet the requirements of an equivalent position.
(2) If a shift has been eliminated, or overtime has been decreased,
an employee would not be entitled to return to work that shift or the
original overtime hours upon restoration. However, if a position on,
for example, a night shift has been filled by another employee, the
employee is entitled to return to the same shift on which employed
before taking FMLA leave.
(3) If an employee was hired for a specific term or only to perform
work on a discrete project, the employer has no obligation to restore
the employee if the employment term or project is over and the employer
would not otherwise have continued to employ the employee. On the other
hand, if an employee was hired to perform work on a contract, and after
that contract period the contract was awarded to another contractor,
the successor contractor may be required to restore the employee if it
is a successor employer. See Sec. 825.107.
(b) In addition to the circumstances explained above, an employer
may deny job restoration to salaried eligible employees ("key
employees," as defined in Sec. 825.217(c)), if such denial is
necessary to prevent substantial and grievous economic injury to the
operations of the employer; or may delay restoration to an employee who
fails to provide a fitness-for-duty certificate to return to work under
the conditions described in Sec. 825.312.
(c) If the employee is unable to perform an essential function of
the position because of a physical or mental condition, including the
continuation of a serious health condition or an injury or illness also
covered by workers' compensation, the employee has no right to
restoration to another position under the FMLA. The employer's
obligations may, however, be governed by the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), as amended. See Sec. 825.702, state leave
laws, or workers' compensation laws.
(d) An employee who fraudulently obtains FMLA leave from an
employer is not protected by FMLA's job restoration or maintenance of
health benefits provisions.
(e) If the employer has a uniformly-applied policy governing
outside or supplemental employment, such a policy may continue to apply
to an employee while on FMLA leave. An employer which does not have
such a policy may not deny benefits to which an employee is entitled
under FMLA on this basis unless the FMLA leave was fraudulently
obtained as in paragraph (d) of this section.
[73 FR 68094, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| What is a ``key employee'? 825.217
|
| (a) A "key employee" is a salaried FMLA-eligible employee who is
among the highest paid 10 percent of all the employees employed by the
employer within 75 miles of the employee's worksite.
(b) The term "salaried" means "paid on a salary basis," as
defined in 29 CFR 541.602. This is the Department of Labor regulation
defining employees who may qualify as exempt from the minimum wage and
overtime requirements of the FLSA as executive, administrative,
professional, and computer employees.
(c) A "key employee" must be "among the highest paid 10
percent" of all the employees--both salaried and non-salaried,
eligible and ineligible--who are employed by the employer within 75
miles of the worksite.
(1) In determining which employees are among the highest paid 10
percent, year-to-date earnings are divided by weeks worked by the
employee (including weeks in which paid leave was taken). Earnings
include wages, premium pay, incentive pay, and non-discretionary and
discretionary bonuses. Earnings do not include incentives whose value
is determined at some future date, e.g., stock options, or benefits or
perquisites.
(2) The determination of whether a salaried employee is among the
highest paid 10 percent shall be made at the time the employee gives
notice of the need for leave. No more than 10 percent of the employer's
employees within 75 miles of the worksite may be "key employees."
[73 FR 68094, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| What does ``substantial and grievous economic injury' mean? 825.218
|
| (a) In order to deny restoration to a key employee, an employer
must determine that the restoration of the employee to employment will
cause "substantial and grievous economic injury" to the operations of
the employer, not whether the absence of the employee will cause such
substantial and grievous injury.
(b) An employer may take into account its ability to replace on a
temporary basis (or temporarily do without) the employee on FMLA leave.
If permanent replacement is unavoidable, the cost of then reinstating
the employee can be considered in evaluating whether substantial and
grievous economic injury will occur from restoration; in other words,
the effect on the operations of the company of reinstating the employee
in an equivalent position.
(c) A precise test cannot be set for the level of hardship or
injury to the employer which must be sustained. If the reinstatement
of a "key employee" threatens the economic viability of the firm, that
would constitute "substantial and grievous economic injury." A lesser
injury which causes substantial, long-term economic injury would also
be sufficient. Minor inconveniences and costs that the employer would
experience in the normal course of doing business would certainly not
constitute "substantial and grievous economic injury."
(d) FMLA's "substantial and grievous economic injury" standard is
different from and more stringent than the "undue hardship" test
under the ADA (see also Sec. 825.702).
[73 FR 68094, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| What are the rights of a key employee? 825.219
|
| (a) An employer who believes that reinstatement may be denied to a
key employee, must give written notice to the employee at the time the
employee gives notice of the need for FMLA leave (or when FMLA leave
commences, if earlier) that he or she qualifies as a key employee. At
the same time, the employer must also fully inform the employee of the
potential consequences with respect to reinstatement and maintenance of
health benefits if the employer should determine that substantial and
grievous economic injury to the employer's operations will result if
the employee is reinstated from FMLA leave. If such notice cannot be
given immediately because of the need to determine whether the employee
is a key employee, it shall be given as soon as practicable after being
notified of a need for leave (or the commencement of leave, if
earlier). It is expected that in most circumstances there will be no
desire that an employee be denied restoration after FMLA leave and,
therefore, there would be no need to provide such notice. However, an
employer who fails to provide such timely notice will lose its right to
deny restoration even if substantial and grievous economic injury will
result from reinstatement.
(b) As soon as an employer makes a good faith determination, based
on the facts available, that substantial and grievous economic injury
to its operations will result if a key employee who has given notice of
the need for FMLA leave or is using FMLA leave is reinstated, the
employer shall notify the employee in writing of its determination,
that it cannot deny FMLA leave, and that it intends to deny restoration
to employment on completion of the FMLA leave. It is anticipated that
an employer will ordinarily be able to give such notice prior to the
employee starting leave. The employer must serve this notice either in
person or by certified mail. This notice must explain the basis for the
employer's finding that substantial and grievous economic injury will
result, and, if leave has commenced, must provide the employee a
reasonable time in which to return to work, taking into account the
circumstances, such as the length of the leave and the urgency of the
need for the employee to return.
(c) If an employee on leave does not return to work in response to
the employer's notification of intent to deny restoration, the employee
continues to be entitled to maintenance of health benefits and the
employer may not recover its cost of health benefit premiums. A key
employee's rights under FMLA continue unless and until the employee
either gives notice that he or she no longer wishes to return to work,
or the employer actually denies reinstatement at the conclusion of the
leave period.
(d) After notice to an employee has been given that substantial and
grievous economic injury will result if the employee is reinstated to
employment, an employee is still entitled to request reinstatement at
the end of the leave period even if the employee did not return to work
in response to the employer's notice. The employer must then again
determine whether there will be substantial and grievous economic
injury from reinstatement, based on the facts at that time. If it is
determined that substantial and grievous economic injury will result,
the employer shall notify the employee in writing (in person or by
certified mail) of the denial of restoration.
[73 FR 68095, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| How are employees protected who request leave or otherwise assert FMLA rights? 825.220
|
| (a) The FMLA prohibits interference with an employee's rights under
the law, and with legal proceedings or inquiries relating to an
employee's rights. More specifically, the law contains the following
employee protections:
(1) An employer is prohibited from interfering with, restraining,
or denying the exercise of (or attempts to exercise) any rights
provided by the Act.
(2) An employer is prohibited from discharging or in any other way
discriminating against any person (whether or not an employee) for
opposing or complaining about any unlawful practice under the Act.
(3) All persons (whether or not employers) are prohibited from
discharging or in any other way discriminating against any person
(whether or not an employee) because that person has--
(i) Filed any charge, or has instituted (or caused to be
instituted) any proceeding under or related to this Act;
(ii) Given, or is about to give, any information in connection with
an inquiry or proceeding relating to a right under this Act;
(iii) Testified, or is about to testify, in any inquiry or
proceeding relating to a right under this Act.
(b) Any violations of the Act or of these regulations constitute
interfering with, restraining, or denying the exercise of rights
provided by the Act. An employer may be liable for compensation and
benefits lost by reason of the violation, for other actual monetary
losses sustained as a direct result of the violation, and for
appropriate equitable or other relief, including employment,
reinstatement, promotion, or any other relief tailored to the harm
suffered (see Sec. 825.400(c)). "Interfering with" the exercise of
an employee's rights would include, for example, not only refusing to
authorize FMLA leave, but discouraging an employee from using such
leave. It would also include manipulation by a covered employer to
avoid responsibilities under FMLA, for example:
(1) Transferring employees from one worksite to another for the
purpose of reducing worksites, or to keep worksites, below the 50-
employee threshold for employee eligibility under the Act;
(2) Changing the essential functions of the job in order to
preclude the taking of leave;
(3) Reducing hours available to work in order to avoid employee
eligibility.
(c) The Act's prohibition against "interference" prohibits an
employer from discriminating or retaliating against an employee or
prospective employee for having exercised or attempted to exercise FMLA
rights. For example, if an employee on leave without pay would
otherwise be entitled to full benefits (other than health benefits),
the same benefits would be required to be provided to an employee on
unpaid FMLA leave. By the same token, employers cannot use the taking
of FMLA leave as a negative factor in employment actions, such as
hiring, promotions or disciplinary actions; nor can FMLA leave be
counted under "no fault" attendance policies. See Sec. 825.215.
(d) Employees cannot waive, nor may employers induce employees to
waive, their prospective rights under FMLA. For example, employees (or
their collective bargaining representatives) cannot "trade off" the
right to take FMLA leave against some other benefit offered by the
employer. This does not prevent the settlement or release of FMLA
claims by employees based on past employer conduct without the
approval of the Department of Labor or a court. Nor does it
prevent an employee's voluntary and uncoerced acceptance (not as a
condition of employment) of a "light duty" assignment while
recovering from a serious health condition (see Sec. 825.702(d)). An
employee's acceptance of such "light duty" assignment does not
constitute a waiver of the employee's prospective rights, including the
right to be restored to the same position the employee held at the time
the employee's FMLA leave commenced or to an equivalent position. The
employee's right to restoration, however, ceases at the end of the
applicable 12-month FMLA leave year.
(e) Individuals, and not merely employees, are protected from
retaliation for opposing (e.g., filing a complaint about) any practice
which is unlawful under the Act. They are similarly protected if they
oppose any practice which they reasonably believe to be a violation of
the Act or regulations.
[73 FR 68095, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| Leave to care for a parent. 825.201
|
| (a) General rule. An eligible employee is entitled to FMLA leave if
needed to care for the employee's parent with a serious health
condition. Care for parents-in-law is not covered by the FMLA. See
Sec. 825.122(b) for definition of parent.
(b) "Same employer" limitation. A husband and wife who are
eligible for FMLA leave and are employed by the same covered employer
may be limited to a combined total of 12 weeks of leave during any 12-
month period if the leave is taken to care for the employee's parent
with a serious health condition, for the birth of the employee's son or
daughter or to care for the child after the birth, or for placement of
a son or daughter with the employee for adoption or foster care or to
care for the child after placement. This limitation on the total weeks
of leave applies to leave taken for the reasons specified as long as a
husband and wife are employed by the "same employer." It would apply,
for example, even though the spouses are employed at two different
worksites of an employer located more than 75 miles from each other, or
by two different operating divisions of the same company. On the other
hand, if one spouse is ineligible for FMLA leave, the other spouse
would be entitled to a full 12 weeks of FMLA leave. Where the husband
and wife both use a portion of the total 12-week FMLA leave entitlement
for either the birth of a child, for placement for adoption or foster
care, or to care for a parent, the husband and wife would each be
entitled to the difference between the amount he or she has taken
individually and 12 weeks for FMLA leave for other purposes. For
example, if each spouse took 6 weeks of leave to care for a parent,
each could use an additional 6 weeks due to his or her own serious
health condition or to care for a child with a serious health
condition. See also Sec. 825.127(d).
[73 FR 68087, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| May an employer transfer an employee to an ``alternative position' in order to accommodate intermittent leave or a reduced leave schedule? 825.204
|
| (a) Transfer or reassignment. If an employee needs intermittent
leave or leave on a reduced leave schedule that is foreseeable based on
planned medical treatment for the employee, a family member, or a
covered servicemember, including during a period of recovery from one's
own serious health condition, a serious health condition of a spouse,
parent, son, or daughter, or a serious injury or illness of a covered
servicemember, or if the employer agrees to permit intermittent or
reduced schedule leave for the birth of a child or for placement of a
child for adoption or foster care, the employer may require the
employee to transfer temporarily, during the period that the
intermittent or reduced leave schedule is required, to an available
alternative position for which the employee is qualified and which
better accommodates recurring periods of leave than does the employee's
regular position. See Sec. 825.601 for special rules applicable to
instructional employees of schools.
(b) Compliance. Transfer to an alternative position may require
compliance with any applicable collective bargaining agreement, federal
law (such as the Americans with Disabilities Act), and State law.
Transfer to an alternative position may include altering an existing
job to better accommodate the employee's need for intermittent or
reduced schedule leave.
(c) Equivalent pay and benefits. The alternative position must have
equivalent pay and benefits. An alternative position for these purposes
does not have to have equivalent duties. The employer may increase the
pay and benefits of an existing alternative position, so as to make
them equivalent to the pay and benefits of the employee's regular job.
The employer may also transfer the employee to a part-time job with the
same hourly rate of pay and benefits, provided the employee is not
required to take more leave than is medically necessary. For example,
an employee desiring to take leave in increments of four hours per day
could be transferred to a half-time job, or could remain in the
employee's same job on a part-time schedule, paying the same hourly
rate as the employee's previous job and enjoying the same benefits. The
employer may not eliminate benefits which otherwise would not be
provided to part-time employees; however, an employer may
proportionately reduce benefits such as vacation leave where an
employer's normal practice is to base such benefits on the number of
hours worked.
(d) Employer limitations. An employer may not transfer the employee
to an alternative position in order to discourage the employee from
taking leave or otherwise work a hardship on the employee. For example,
a white collar employee may not be assigned to perform laborer's work;
an employee working the day shift may not be reassigned to the
graveyard shift; an employee working in the headquarters facility may
not be reassigned to a branch a significant distance away from the
employee's normal job location. Any such attempt on the part of the
employer to make such a transfer will be held to be contrary to the
prohibited acts of the FMLA.
(e) Reinstatement of employee. When an employee who is taking leave
intermittently or on a reduced leave schedule and has been transferred
to an alternative position no longer needs to continue on leave and is
able to return to full-time work, the employee must be placed in the
same or equivalent job as the job he or she left when the leave
commenced. An employee may not be required to take more leave than
necessary to address the circumstance that precipitated the need for
leave.
[73 FR 68088, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
| None. 825.228
|
| None
|

|
| Increments of FMLA leave for intermittent or reduced schedule leave. 825.205
|
| (a) Minimum increment. (1) When an employee takes FMLA leave on an
intermittent or reduced leave schedule basis, the employer must account
for the leave using an increment no greater than the shortest period of
time that the employer uses to account for use of other forms of leave
provided that it is not greater than one hour and provided further that
an employee's FMLA leave entitlement may not be reduced by more than
the amount of leave actually taken. If an employer accounts for use of
leave in varying increments at different times of the day or shift, the
employer may not account for FMLA leave in a larger increment than the
shortest period used to account for other leave during the period in
which the FMLA leave is taken. If an employer accounts for other forms
of leave use in increments greater than one hour, the employer must
account for FMLA leave use in increments no greater than one hour. An
employer may account for FMLA leave in shorter increments than used for
other forms of leave. For example, an employer that accounts for other
forms of leave in one hour increments may account for FMLA leave in a
shorter increment when the employee arrives at work several minutes
late, and the employer wants the employee to begin work immediately.
Such accounting for FMLA leave will not alter the increment considered
to be the shortest period used to account for other forms of leave or
the use of FMLA leave in other circumstances.
(2) Where it is physically impossible for an employee using
intermittent leave or working a reduced leave schedule to commence or
end work mid-way through a shift, such as where a flight attendant or a
railroad conductor is scheduled to work aboard an airplane or train, or
a laboratory employee is unable to enter or leave a sealed ``clean
room'' during a certain period of time, the entire period that the
employee is forced to be absent is designated as FMLA leave and counts
against the employee's FMLA entitlement.
(b) Calculation of leave. (1) When an employee takes leave on an
intermittent or reduced leave schedule, only the amount of leave
actually taken may be counted toward the employee's leave entitlement.
The actual workweek is the basis of leave entitlement. Therefore, if an
employee who would otherwise work 40 hours a week takes off 8 hours,
the employee would use \1/5\ of a week of FMLA leave. Similarly, if a
full-time employee who would otherwise work 8-hour days works 4-hour
days under a reduced leave schedule, the employee would use \1/2\ week
of FMLA leave. Where an employee works a part-time schedule or variable
hours, the amount of FMLA leave that an employee uses is determined on
a pro rata or proportional basis. For example, if an employee who would
otherwise work 30 hours per week, but works only 20 hours a week under
a reduced leave schedule, the employee's ten hours of leave would
constitute one-third (\1/3\) of a week of FMLA leave for each week the
employee works the reduced leave schedule. An employer may convert
these fractions to their hourly equivalent so long as the conversion
equitably reflects the employee's total normally scheduled hours.
See also, Sec. Sec. 825.601 and 825.602, special rules for schools.
(2) If an employer has made a permanent or long-term change in the
employee's schedule (for reasons other than FMLA, and prior to the
notice of need for FMLA leave), the hours worked under the new schedule
are to be used for making this calculation.
(3) If an employee's schedule varies from week to week to such an
extent that an employer is unable to determine with any certainty how
many hours the employee would otherwise have worked (but for the taking
of FMLA leave), a weekly average of the hours scheduled over the 12
months prior to the beginning of the leave period (including any hours
for which the employee took leave of any type) would be used for
calculating the employee's leave entitlement.
(c) Overtime. If an employee would normally be required to work
overtime, but is unable to do so because of a FMLA-qualifying reason
that limits the employee's ability to work overtime, the hours which
the employee would have been required to work may be counted against
the employee's FMLA entitlement. In such a case, the employee is using
intermittent or reduced schedule leave. For example, if an employee
would normally be required to work for 48 hours in a particular week,
but due to a serious health condition the employee is unable to work
more than 40 hours that week, the employee would utilize eight hours of
FMLA-protected leave out of the 48-hour workweek (\8/48\ = \1/6\
workweek). Voluntary overtime hours that an employee does not work due
to a serious health condition may not be counted against the employee's
FMLA leave entitlement.
[73 FR 68088, Nov. 17, 2008]
|

|
|
 |